It uses a TINTIN-like syntax, but it's definitely something different. I reckon CMUD and zMUD shouldn't be listed as using TINTIN for their language, but a client specific language. Scandum ( talk) 21:04, 12 November 2009 (UTC) Reply It's difficult to say where to draw the line, zMud has MMCP support through a plugin, and the same goes for MUSHclient's MSP support, does your reasoning imply their 'yes' status should be changed to 'no' ? I think it's primarily a matter of accessibility. Not sure if there's a better way to list it, not to mention there are different levels of shell integration. Additionally tintin supports a higher level form of redirection that allows running external scripts and feeding the output back into the client for evaluation. 209.121.200.4 ( talk) 15:02, 12 November 2009 (UTC) Reply tintin and kbtin have redirection support which allows running external console applications within the client, including ssh, lynx, and stunnel. It seems a little absurd to say that, since then pretty much every one of those columns would have a little note like that. in most of these languages and interact with whatever other interpreter or compiled code you want. I mean, you could create a COM object, P/Invoke, etc. I have no idea how that relates to scripting or SSH.Īlso, I removed the note about Ruby being able to work with other "scripting languages like C". Can someone explain this note? "CLI: command-line interface using redirection, not to be confused with system (C standard library)".
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |